New Jersey DWI Attorney Reminds You to Be Extra Careful About Drunk Driving Around the Holidays

December 13, 2016 by

A drink and car keys

With Thanksgiving just behind us, and holidays like Christmas, Hanukkah, and New Year’s Eve around the corner, we at the Law Office of Edward M. Janzekovich would like to remind you to be extra careful about drunk driving when it comes to going out and celebrating this festive and happy holiday season.

Not only should you be extra careful so that you can keep yourself and your loved ones safe, you should also be aware that police officers and government officials are on high alert for any potential drunk or intoxicated drivers during the holidays. One little mistake, such as thinking you can drive when your blood alcohol content (BAC) is actually above .08%, can result in serious consequences – such as fines, jail time, or loss of driving privileges – that affect you for years to come.

Heightened Police Activity and DUI Checkpoints

Last year, Pennsauken, Woodbridge, Spotswood, and Wall townships reported the most DWI arrests in the state between December 11, 2015 and January 1, 2016. This past Thanksgiving, NJ.com reported that at least 15 New Jersey towns planned to increase DUI patrols and checkpoints during the holiday weekend (http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2016/11/where_nj_cops_are_increasing_dui_patrols_checkpoin.html). These included:

  • Atlantic Highlands
  • Aberdeen
  • Belmar
  • Hazlet
  • Highlands
  • Holmdel
  • Keyport
  • Keansburg
  • Matawan
  • Middletown
  • Neptune
  • New Brunswick
  • North Bergen
  • Union Beach
  • Union City

Between now and New Year’s Day, police officers across the state will be on the look-out for any signs or drunk driving. Therefore, if you plan to go out and drink this holiday season, you should take a taxi, call an Uber, or pick a designated driver. Otherwise, even if you don’t get in an accident and hurt yourself or others, you run the risk of getting arrested for drunk driving every time you choose to have even one drink and get behind the wheel.

DUI Checkpoints, Sobriety Tests, and Taking a Breathalyzer

Police officers will be most likely to set up DUI checkpoints at the location of bars or other venues where lots of people will be drinking. This is important, because it means you could be randomly stopped and checked for signs of drunk driving, even if you do not display any erratic behavior on the road – such as swerving, speeding, or braking unexpectedly – just for going to certain venues during the holidays. In New Jersey, police officers are actually prohibited from stopping cars based on appearance alone at checkpoints, so cars will be detained in a pre-selected pattern such as every car or every third car.

That means that even if you are driving perfectly, you could be pulled over at a DUI checkpoint. Then, if the police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe you were driving drunk – such as smelling alcohol on your breath – you could be asked to take a field sobriety test or possibly even take a breathalyzer.

Once you’ve taken a breathalyzer, any BAC reading of .08% or higher can potentially be used as proof of guilt for a charge of DUI/DWI. That means that even if you were driving perfectly, and you do not believe you did anything wrong, you could still be convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol based on your breathalyzer results. As we’ve discussed in this blog before, whether you are functional or coordinated during a sobriety test is not a defense against a BAC at or above 0.08%

Therefore, the best advice we can give you this holiday season is to be careful. If you or someone you know is arrested or charged with a DUI or DWI, it is important to contact an experienced attorney immediately. A professional drunk driving lawyer will review your case and can help fight the charges against you.

New Jersey Drunk Driving Attorney Edward M. Janzekovich Is There for You This Holiday Season

If you or someone you know is charged for any crime relating to driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, it is extremely important to contact an experienced DUI/DWI attorney who will explain what consequences you are facing in your specific situation. If you go to court, an experienced lawyer will also argue on your behalf and may be able to have the charges dropped entirely. Having an experienced drunk driving lawyer can make all the difference. To speak with an experienced New Jersey DWI/DUI lawyer about your situation, call us at 732-257-1137 or contact us online today. We serve clients throughout the state of New Jersey.

Filed Under: Drunk Driving, DWI - DUI, DWI & DUI Checkpoints Tagged With: , , , , , , , , ,

New Jersey Drunk Driving Lawyer – Underage DUI-DWI

May 26, 2016 by

The legal drinking age in the state of New Jersey is 21, and the minimum legal driving age is 17. What happens if an underage drinker gets behind the wheel of a car in New Jersey? The penalties and collateral consequences can be devastating. Because underage drinkers cause a disproportionate number of alcohol-related auto fatalities, the state has enacted stricter laws and harsher penalties for drunk drivers under the age of 21.

New Jersey is a no-tolerance state. If a minor is pulled over under suspicion of drunk driving, a Breathalyzer test will be administered.  However, if the test results indicate that they have a blood alcohol content (BAC) of .01 percent or higher, they can be charged with a DUI. For drivers over the age of 21, driving with a BAC of .01 percent is not in itself illegal—in order to be charged with DUI an adult generally must have a BAC of .08 percent or higher.

Underage Drinkers May Face Additional Related Charges

In addition to being charged with a DUI, underage drinkers may be charged with:

  • Being a minor in possession of alcohol
  • Soliciting alcohol
  • Possession of false identification
  • Moving and vehicle maintenance violations
  • Distributing alcohol to other minors if there were underage intoxicated passengers in the car

Penalties

Drivers under the age of 21 who are convicted of driving under the influence face:

  • A 30 to 90-day driver’s license suspension (for high rate DWI’s with a BAC of .10 or higher, an underage drinker could lose their license for up to a year)
  • 15 to 30 days mandatory community service
  • Mandatory participation in an Intoxicated Driver Resource Center (this involves a detainment period of between 12 and 48 hours)
  • If under the age of 17 and unlicensed, a 30 to 90 delay in processing your driver’s license
  • Up to 30 days in jail
  • Fines between $250 and $500 depending on the driver’s BAC
  • Surcharges in excess of $3,500

Collateral Consequences

If you are convicted of an underage DWI, you may have difficulty achieving your educational goals. Colleges and universities perform background checks, and a conviction on your record could be cause for an admission or scholarship denial.

An underage DWI may also pop up on an employment background check. In today’s market, where there are many quality applicants competing for every job, a DWI on your record could prevent you from getting work.

Car insurance companies are known to terminate coverage to minors convicted of driving under the influence, or refuse to renew. If coverage is offered, the rates tend to be very high due to the risk the insurer must assume. Some companies raise the monthly premium by $100-$300 a month for the next three to five years.

Underage drivers may also need to submit an SR-22 certificate to reinstate their license after a period of suspension.  This forms tells the DMV that a driver is insured, and many companies furnish this form to the DMV for their insureds.

Defending Against Underage DWI Charges

There is an array of defenses available to minors charged with DWI. One of the most commonly employed defenses is that many natural and artificial substances can cause a breath test to register a BAC reading of .01 percent.

There are also defenses available based on your right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment. If your constitutional rights were violated, any illegally obtained evidence cannot be used against you at trial.

New Jersey DUI Lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich Defends Minors Accused of Driving While Intoxicated

If you or your child has been charged with an underage DUI, reputable New Jersey DWI lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich can help. We understand the stress you are under as you face unknown, potentially life altering consequences.  You do not need to face these battles alone.  We strive to ease our clients’ minds by thoroughly explaining the legal process, and our goal is always to get our clients’ cases dismissed altogether.

To schedule your confidential consultation today, call us at 732-257-1137 or contact us online today. We represent clients throughout New Jersey, including Ocean County, Monmouth County, Mercer County, Middlesex County, Union County and Somerset County.

 

Filed Under: Criminal Law, Drunk Driving, DWI - DUI, Underage DUI Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

New Jersey DWI – DUI Lawyer – Boating Under the Influence (BUI)

May 17, 2016 by

Memorial Day is just around the corner, and many people in New Jersey will be celebrating the unofficial kick off to summer by doing some recreational boating or other activities on the water.  New Jersey is becoming increasingly crowded, meaning residents and tourists are flocking to our waterways in record numbers, increasing the chances of boating incidents.

The New Jersey State Police and the United States Coast Guard are the two law enforcement agencies that combat intoxicated boating in New Jersey.  If you are stopped for suspicion of BUI, law enforcement will require the boat captain to take the same sobriety test as someone who has been stopped in their car.  The captain may also have to submit to a Breathalyzer test to see if their blood alcohol content (BAC) is above the legal limit.  When the operator of a vessel is asked to take a Breathalyzer test, they are presumed to have consented to the test by accepting their boating license.  This is known as implied consent.  Refusing to take the Breathalyzer test will result in an additional charge for refusing the test, and you may still be charged with a BUI.

The law that governs intoxicated boating in New Jersey, N.J.S.A. 12:7-46, was enacted in 1995.  Prior to that time, careless, reckless, or intoxicated boaters could be re-licensed by simply paying a fine and servicing a period of license suspension.  Under the new law, offenders must also take a boating safety course as a condition of re-licensure.

The Legislature modeled the intoxicated boating laws on the existing drunk driving statutes.  In order to be convicted of a boating DWI, the prosecutor must prove three elements:

  • The suspect must have been operating a “vessel” (a water vessel that is 12 feet or more);
  • They must have been operating it in New Jersey waters; and
  • They must have been operating it under the influence of an intoxicating liquor, a narcotic, hallucinogenic or habit-producing drug; this is often proven by establishing that the vessel’s operator had a BAC of .08 percent or greater.

In addition, a person can be convicted of a BUI if they permit another person who is under the influence of drugs or has a BAC of .08 percent or greater to operate a vessel.  If an individual is operating a commercial vessel, the lower BAC of .04 percent is considered the legal limit.

Penalties for BUI

If you are convicted of a BUI, not only will you lose your boating license, but you will also lose your regular driver’s license.  The first time an individual is convicted of boating while intoxicated, their boating license will be revoked for one year, their driver’s license will be suspended for three months, and they will face a fine of between $250 and $400.  Court costs of $33 may be imposed, as well as a $50 assessment for the Victims of Crime Compensation Board (VCCB).  These fines will be even greater if a person had a BAC of .10 percent or higher.  First time offenders must also complete a program of alcohol education at the Intoxicated Driver Resource Center (IDRC), and take a boating safety course

For a second BUI offense, a person will lose their boating license for two years, and their driver’s license for six months.  They will also face two to 90 days in jail, a fine of between $500 and $1000, and costs and fees.  Convicted defendants must also serve 30 days of community service, and complete a rehabilitation program at the IDRC.

For third and subsequent offenses, a person will lose their boating license for ten years and their driver’s license for two full years.  In addition, a third BUI will result in a mandatory 180-day jail term.  Community service may be substituted for part of this term.  Third time offenders must pay a $1000 fine plus costs and fees, complete a boating safety course and a rehabilitation program at the IDRC.

New Jersey Boating While Intoxicated Lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich Defends Individuals Charged With a BUI

Getting a BUI is a serious matter that can result in crippling fines and potential jail time.  A conviction for BUI will also count as a prior offense if you are subsequently charged with additional DWI offenses.  At the Law Office of Edward M. Janzekovich, our goal is always to help our clients avoid a conviction.  To discuss your case, call us at 732-257-1137 or contact us online today.  We represent clients throughout New Jersey, including Ocean County, Monmouth County, Mercer County, Middlesex County, Union County and Somerset County.

Filed Under: Boating Under the Influence (BUI), Criminal Law, Drunk Driving, DWI - DUI Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

New Jersey DUI Lawyer – Supreme Court Questions Whether Drivers Can Be Forced to Take a Breathalyzer Test Without a Warrant

May 12, 2016 by

Last month, the United States Supreme Court addressed whether police can require drivers to take a “deep-lung” breath test without a search warrant. Three cases out of Minnesota and North Dakota were joined and brought before the Court. These states have laws that make it a crime for drivers to refuse to take a breathalyzer, urine, or blood test. Eleven other states have similar laws, including Alaska, Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont and Virginia. A majority of the justices questioned whether these laws criminalizing refusal are constitutional, in light of an individual’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.

Generally speaking, the police cannot search a driver or their car after an arrest without first getting a search warrant, unless it is for their own personal safety or to preserve evidence. In 2013, the Supreme Court ruled that police cannot conduct blood tests for drunken driving without first obtaining a warrant. However, some justices remain hesitant to apply the same rule to the breathalyzer test, because it is less intrusive than drawing blood.

Previously in North Dakota, refusal to submit to a chemical test carried only civil penalties, such as the suspension or revocation of one’s license. However in 2013, North Dakota lawmakers passed legislation to make penalties for drunk driving offenses more severe—in part by punishing a refusal to take a breathalyzer test in the same manner as it punishes the crime of driving under the influence.

The groups backing the states’ laws, including Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), have argued that when a person applies for a driver’s license, they give their implied consent to be subjected to a chemical test in the event that they are arrested for suspected drunk driving.

However, several groups backing the defendants, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the DUI Defense Lawyers Association (DDLA), have argued that the government cannot criminalize conduct protected by the Fourth Amendment. One cannot truly give “implied consent” to take a breathalyzer test when they get their license if they know that they will face criminal sanctions for refusing to take the test. The DDLA argued that there are better ways to deter drunk driving, including creating an electronic warrant system, setting up sobriety checkpoints, providing alcohol abuse treatment, and requiring the use of ignition interlock devices for convicted drunk drivers.

So how did the justices come down on the issue? Justice Samuel Alito was the only justice who seemed to be strongly in favor of criminalizing refusal, and he emphasized that breathalyzer tests are only a minimal intrusion. He expressed that the only reason people don’t want to submit to a breathalyzer test is because they don’t want their blood alcohol measured, it is not that they object to blowing into a straw. Justice Kagan seemed to agree with this line of reasoning, noting that police have an interest in testing a driver’s breath as quickly as possible, before their blood alcohol content (BAC) goes down.

Ultimately, the states were unable to come up with a persuasive reason why police cannot secure a warrant while transporting suspects to the police station or hospital for testing. Forty states now utilize electronic warrant systems.

Although it is not a crime to refuse to take a breathalyzer test in New Jersey, there are harsh civil penalties, including fines, motor vehicles surcharges, a long suspension of driving privileges and special sentencing enhancements if the refusal occurs within a school zone. A refusal can also be used to draw an inference of guilt in a DUI trial. If you are pulled over in New Jersey for a suspected DUI, the police can detain you and bring you to a hospital where staff may draw blood.

New Jersey DUI/DWI Lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich Represents Drivers Who Have Refused Chemical Testing

If you were arrested for drunk driving and refused to submit to chemical testing, you are likely facing steep penalties. In addition to a DWI charge, you are probably also facing penalties for refusing to take the breathalyzer test. To speak to an experienced New Jersey DUI lawyer and begin building your defense, call the Law Office of Edward M. Janzekovich at 732-257-1137 or contact us online today. We represent clients throughout New Jersey, including Ocean County, Monmouth County, Mercer County, Middlesex County, Union County and Somerset County.

Filed Under: Criminal Law, Current Events, Drunk Driving, DWI - DUI, New Jersey Attorney Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

New Jersey DUI – DWI Lawyer – Driving Under the Influence of Marijuana

May 3, 2016 by

It is illegal to drive while high on marijuana (weed, pot, etc.) in New Jersey.  Although New Jersey does not have a specific law that addresses driving under the influence of marijuana, the same law that prohibits drunk driving (N.J.S.A. 39:4-50, titled “Driving While Intoxicated”) applies to drugged driving offenses as well.  This law prohibits driving under the influence of any intoxicating substance, including narcotics, hallucinogens or even some over the counter medications.

How Do the Authorities Prove a Person is Under the Influence of Marijuana?

When a person is pulled over on suspicion of drunk driving, they are given a breathalyzer test to determine their blood alcohol content.  So how does a police officer know whether a driver is under the influence of marijuana?  Usually, a driver will be asked to take a blood or urine test.  However, a positive drug test only indicates that there is marijuana in a person’s system at the time of the traffic stop—and marijuana can stay in a person’s system weeks after using it.  Therefore, if you are arrested for drugged driving, additional evidence is generally relied upon to prove the DUI in court.

If you go to trial for your DUI charge, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you were operating a vehicle under the influence of marijuana.  This requires some expert testimony to establish that the drugs found in your system were not just residual, but actually rendered you impaired and unable to safely operate a motor vehicle.

In drugged driving cases, the general rule is that the accused must have been tested at the time of their arrest by a specially trained police officer referred to as a Drug Recognition Expert (“DRE”).  However, for marijuana cases, the prosecutor can establish intoxication through testimony of any police officer who has been trained in field sobriety and who has experience in identifying marijuana intoxication.  In such cases, an officer will testify that there was objective evidence that a driver’s physical or mental capabilities were impaired by the drug.  This testimony can be the State’s Achilles heel.  An experienced DWI lawyer may be able to have your charges either dismissed or downgraded by discrediting this testimony.

No Implied Consent for Blood or Urine Testing

In New Jersey, as a condition of receiving your driver’s license, you have agreed to take a breath test to determine the content of alcohol in your system if you are pulled over on suspicion of drunk driving.  This is known as “implied consent.”  If you refuse to take the test, you are subject to punishment including a loss of driving privileges.  But this law does not extend to drivers who are suspected of being under the influence of marijuana or other substances.  If you are pulled over and the police suspect that you are high on marijuana or some other substance, there are no penalties or sanctions if you refuse to submit to a blood or urine test.  Chemical testing for marijuana or any other substance is only performed on a voluntary basis or if a warrant has been issued by a judge.  First, the investigating officer would ask you for your consent to provide a urine or blood sample.  If you refuse, then the officer can attempt to obtain a warrant from a judge, based upon probable cause.  If a warrant is issued, then you have to comply.  It is amazing just how many people, knowing full well they have a substance in their system, agree to voluntarily submit to a blood or urine test.  Most people just don’t know they can say no.

Penalties for Driving Under the Influence of Marijuana

Penalty for a conviction will vary depending on whether you have ever been convicted of drugged driving in the past.

  • For a first conviction, drivers face a fine of between $300 and $500, up to 30 days in jail, and between seven months and one-year license suspension.
  • For a second conviction, drivers face a fine of between $500 and $1,000, 30 days community service, 2 to 90 days in jail, and a two-year license suspension.
  • For a third (or subsequent) conviction, drivers face fines up to $1,000, 180 days in jail, and a ten-year license suspension.

If you have been charged with drugged driving, you may also face additional penalties for related charges such as possession of a controlled dangerous substance.

What About Medical Marijuana?

Although New Jersey allows certain individuals to use medical marijuana, just like any other legally prescribed medication, it is still a crime to drive if one’s ability to safely drive a car is impaired by the drug.

Edward M. Janzekovich Defends People Charged with Marijuana DWI/DUI

If you were arrested for driving while impaired by marijuana, we can help.  Trusted New Jersey DWI lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich is available to answer your questions and discuss your best defense.  Call us today at 732-257-1137 or contact us online today.  We serve clients throughout New Jersey, including Ocean County, Monmouth County, Mercer County, Middlesex County, Union County and Somerset County.

Filed Under: Driving Under the Influence of Marijuana, Drugged Driving, DWI - DUI, Implied Consent, New Jersey Attorney Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

New Jersey DUI/DWI Lawyer – Truck Drivers and DUI

April 19, 2016 by

If your family relies on your New Jersey commercial driver’s license (CDL) for income, the consequences of a DUI conviction can be devastating.  Even if you are not on the job and just driving your own personal vehicle, a DUI conviction or refusal offense will result in a one-year mandatory CDL suspension (three years if the violation occurred in a HAZMAT truck).  You will also lose your basic license for three to 12 months.  Commercial truckers convicted of a DUI are unlikely to ever find work driving a truck again.  And if you are convicted of drunk driving a second time, your CDL will be permanently revoked and you will lose your basic drivers license for two years.  At the Law Office of Edward M. Janzekovich, our goal is always to avoid a conviction for our clients.

Driving a Commercial Truck Under the Influence

As you can see, New Jersey law is harsh when it comes to truckers who drive while intoxicated in their own cars.  So you can imagine how the law treats drivers who drink before getting behind the wheel of a large commercial vehicle.  In 1990, the New Jersey Legislature cracked down on trucking safety and enacted the New Jersey Commercial Driver License Act.  Pursuant to the Act, it is illegal to operate a commercial motor vehicle in New Jersey with an alcohol concentration of 0.04 percent or more.  The legal limit for driving a passenger car in New Jersey is 0.08 percent.  This law aims to discourage truckers from consuming even small amounts of alcohol in an effort to reduce accidents and fatalities.

What is a “Commercial Motor Vehicle?”

So, it is illegal operate a commercial motor vehicle with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of more than 0.04 percent.  What if you are pulled over your RV while on vacation with a BAC of 0.05 percent, will you be charged with drunk driving?  Although RVs are large enough to constitute a “commercial motor vehicle,” the law makes an exception for certain privately owned recreational vehicles.  The following vehicles, however, will all trigger the lower 0.04 percent BAC threshold:

  • School buses
  • Passenger buses (If used to transport passengers to and from places of employment on a daily basis, even a bus with seven passenger seats will qualify as a commercial vehicle. If used less frequently, any bus designed to transport 16 or more passengers will trigger the lower BAC threshold).
  • Vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 26,001 pounds or more
  • Trucks displaying hazardous material placards

“Operation” of a Commercial Motor Vehicle

Trucking is a more a lifestyle than a job.  In covering long distances, drivers often sleep in their cabs at truck stops.  In New Jersey, “operation” of a motor vehicle does not require that the truck actually be moving.  The prosecutor only needs to prove that a driver intended to put the vehicle in motion, and that it was possible that the truck could be moved.  Therefore, it is possible to be charged with a DUI in a truck stop parking lot even if you never leave your cab.

Out of State Convictions

If you have been convicted of driving while intoxicated in another state, either in a truck or your personal vehicle, your New Jersey CDL will be suspended for one year.  If you are convicted a second time, your CDL will be permanently revoked.

New Jersey Commercial DWI Lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich Fights for Truck Drivers

If you are a commercial driver and you have been charged with a DUI, we understand the fear and anxiety you may be feeling.  Getting a DUI is a frightening experience for anyone, but for truckers, the stakes are even higher.  At the Law Office of Edward M. Janzekovich, we make it a priority to communicate with our clients.  We will explain what you can expect throughout the legal process and what your options are.  To speak to an experienced New Jersey DUI lawyer, call the Law Office of Edward M. Janzekovich at 732-257-1137 or contact us online today.  We represent clients throughout New Jersey, including Ocean County, Monmouth County, Mercer County, Middlesex County, Union County and Somerset County.

Filed Under: Drunk Driving, DWI - DUI, New Jersey Attorney, Truck Drivers and DUI Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

New Jersey DUI Lawyer Discusses the Use of Video Evidence in DWI Cases

March 29, 2016 by

If you are pulled over for suspected drunk driving in New Jersey, it is very likely that the police will make a video recording.  Remember that your words and actions will be videotaped from the moment an officer turns on the police car’s lights.  Even if you feel that the stop is not justified, always remain polite and compliant because a judge may later view the tape.  Although it might seem like video of a DWI arrest will seal the case against you, video evidence can actually be helpful to your defense—especially if your rights have been violated or the officers exaggerated their observations when filling out their reports.

When Are Suspects Recorded?

Currently, the New Jersey State Police record both the motor vehicle stop as well as the subsequent roadside investigation (including the field sobriety tests).  The State Police do not currently videotape suspects taking breathalyzer tests while back in custody at the State Police barracks.

On March 1, 2015, a new law took effect requiring all newly purchased municipal police cars to be equipped with mobile video recording systems.  The requirement applies to police cars primarily used for traffic stops.  Many municipal police departments record the initial stop, the roadside investigation and some even record the administration of the breathalyzer test back at the station.

Mobile Video Recording (MVR) Technology

MVR devices coordinate the operation of a video camera mounted in the police car with the overhead police lights on the top of the police car.  When the lights are turned on to pull a car over, the video starts recording.  The video is electronically time and date stamped.  Police officers wear portable remote microphones to record audio of your exchange.  Anything you say to the police will be a part of that video record.  Consequently, if you are pulled over under suspicion of drunk driving, you should not make any statements to the police until you have spoken to an experienced New Jersey DWI lawyer (except basic information like your name, address, date of birth, etc.)  You may think you are helping your case, but you cannot anticipate how your words will later be used against you in court.

Video recording systems in older police stations tend to use dated technology.  The quality of the video and sound from these older wall-mounted devices varies greatly from precinct to precinct.  Some recordings may be so poor as to be completely indecipherable.

Does the Judge Always See The Video?

The judge will not see the video unless either your attorney or the prosecutor introduces it as evidence in your trial.  In order to be admitted, the arresting officer and/or officer who administered the breathalyzer must also testify.  The judge cannot view the video of his or her own accord.

There are objections that can be raised to prevent the judge from viewing the tape or admitting it as evidence.  Most often, a defendant will object that the recording contains statements that constitute admissions, on grounds that they have not been advised of their right to remain silent.  Even if these parts of the video are redacted, other parts of the recording can still be admitted (for example video of the defendant stumbling while being fingerprinted or slurring words).

How Can the Video Help Me?

In order to affect a valid traffic stop, the police need a justifiable reason to pull you over—otherwise all the evidence subsequently gathered must be excluded at your trial.  If the police claim to have pulled you over because you were swerving erratically, but the video shows that you were not, this may be grounds for dismissal of your case.

The video recording should also capture the field sobriety tests.  If, for example, you failed the “standing on one leg” test because it was administered on challenging terrain, you may receive the benefit of the doubt in court.

If a police officer requests that a driver take a breathalyzer test, the driver cannot legally refuse.  The officer is required to read from a prepared statement when asking the driver to take the test.  If there is a dispute as to whether a driver actually refused to take the test, a video recording can clear this up.

Also, if an officer does not adhere to the required 20-minute observation period prior to administering a breathalyzer, the video can prove this, and it could be grounds for an acquittal or dismissal.

If a recording is lost or taped over, this may constitute a due process violation that requires the dismissal of your case.

New Jersey DWI Lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich Knows How to Use Video Recordings to his Clients’ Advantage

If you have been arrested for drunk driving in New Jersey, you should begin crafting your defense right away. New Jersey DUI attorney Edward M. Janzekovich is known throughout New Jersey for consistently getting positive results for his clients. To learn more about how we can help, call us at 732-257-1137 or contact us online today. We serve clients throughout New Jersey including Monmouth County, Middlesex County, and Ocean County.

Filed Under: Criminal Law, Drunk Driving, DWI - DUI, DWI Video Evidence Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

New Jersey Drunk Driving Lawyer – When Your Car Is Impounded After a DWI-DUI

March 22, 2016 by

Key Facts About Vehicle Impoundment in New Jersey

If you are arrested for driving while intoxicated or for refusing to submit to a breath test, the police must impound the vehicle you were driving.  State law requires that your car be impounded for at least 12 hours.  After the 12-hour mandatory impoundment period, you can reclaim your car, or send someone to reclaim it on your behalf.  You are responsible for paying a reasonable fee for towing and storage, and your car will remain in the impound lot until you can pay the fee in full.

If you do not own the car you were arrested in, the lawful owner can reclaim their car prior to the 12-hour period provided that they can:

  • Present a valid license, proof of ownership, proof of lawful authority to operate the vehicle, and proof of current car insurance.
  • Proof that they are capable of operating the car in a safe manner and would not be in violation of any motor vehicle code.
  • Proof that the person receiving the car can comply with any other conditions for release of the vehicle established by the arresting law enforcement agency.

DWI Car Hold – John’s Law

The law that authorizes police to hold cars for up to 12 hours after a DWI is referred to as “John’s Law.”  Tragically, a young man named John R. Elliot was killed on July 22, 2000 in a head-on collision with a driver who had been charged with drunk driving earlier that evening.  John was a promising midshipman from the United States Naval Academy. John’s father persuaded lawmakers to adopt the 12-hour mandatory minimum holding period to prevent others from suffering the same fate as his late son.

The drunk driver who caused the crash, Michael Pangle, had been arrested with a blood-alcohol content of 0.21 percent earlier that night and was taken to the state police barracks.  He was released when a friend came to get him.  Just three hours after his release, he was driving the same SUV that he had been arrested in earlier that evening.  Both Pangle and Elliot were killed instantly in the crash.

The friend who picked Pangle up was charged with manslaughter, vehicular homicide and aggravated assault as an accomplice to the drunk driving accident, even though he was not in the car at the time.  His trial ended in a hung jury.

Can the Police Search Your Car While it is Impounded?

Whether the police may conduct a search of the interior of your car while it is impounded depends on the facts of your case.  Under certain circumstances, police may perform an “inventory” search of your car’s content so that your property can be accounted for and safeguarded.  If law enforcement stumble upon contraband (including drugs or weapons) during the process you may be charged with a crime.  Police cannot automatically conduct an inventory search when your car is impounded: the owner of the vehicle must first be given the opportunity to remove their property from the car.

Police can also search your impounded car if they had probable cause to conduct a warrantless search at the spot where the officers encountered the car.  For example, if police saw drugs lying on your seat when they pulled you over for swerving and arrested you for drunk driving, they can bring your car back to impound and search it there.

Officers can also search your impounded car if a judge has issued a warrant based on probable cause that evidence of a crime is located inside the vehicle.

New Jersey DWI Lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich Defends Against Drunk Driving Charges and Illegal Searches

If you have been arrested for driving under the influence, you need an experienced lawyer in your corner.  New Jersey DUI lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich has a successful track record of defending against drunk driving charges and illegal searches, such as purported “inventory” searches.  To learn more about how we can help you, call us at 732-257-1137 or contact us online today.  We represent clients throughout New Jersey, including Ocean County, Monmouth County, Mercer County, Middlesex County, Union County and Somerset County.

Filed Under: Drunk Driving, DWI - DUI, Illegal Searches and Seizures Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

New Jersey DWI – DUI Lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich – Mixing Prescription Drugs and Alcohol—A Dangerous Combination

March 1, 2016 by

When an individual is arrested for driving under the influence, law enforcement may opt to charge them with driving under the influence of alcohol, a drug, or a combination of both. A person can be found guilty even if the amount of alcohol consumed would be less than the legal limit of .08 percent. This is because the combined effect of drugs and alcohol can produce a synergistic effect—such that even if either substance alone might not impair the driver, their combined effect renders a driver profoundly impaired.

In New Jersey, you can be charged with a DWI even if you are under the influence of over-the-counter drugs or prescription medication that has been legally prescribed to you. Many recent studies demonstrate that common medications, particularly allergy medications, may impair a person’s driving even more than alcohol.

Common medications that can result in a drug-impaired driving charge include:

  • Sleeping pills, such as Ambien
  • Allergy medication, such as Benadryl
  • Cough syrup, such as Nyquil or Codeine-based syrups
  • Prescription painkillers, including Tylenol 3, Vicodin and OxyContin
  • Anti-anxiety medications, such as Ativan, Xanax and other benzodiazepines
  • Antidepressants
  • Muscle relaxers

In the typical scenario where both drugs and alcohol are involved, police will first arrest a motorist for driving under the influence of alcohol. Then, after administering field sobriety tests and a breathalyzer test, if the breathalyzer results and field sobriety test results do not correlate (because the driver appears to be more impaired than the breathalyzer results indicate), police may seek blood or urine samples to determine whether the driver is under the influence of drugs.

Many drugs stay in a person’s system for long periods of time, and can be detected in a person’s blood or urine long after the impairing effects have worn off. Therefore, to be convicted of a DWI in New Jersey for drug use, a driver will most likely be subject to a series of tests conducted by a drug recognition expert. If such an expert is not available at the police station when the driver is tested, the test results may become inadmissible in court.

New Jersey DWI – DUI Lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich Defends Motorists Accused of Driving Under the Influence of Drugs and Alcohol

Respected New Jersey DUI lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich has a vast knowledge of the technicalities of DWI law and has successfully defended countless clients against DWI charges. If you have been charged with driving under the influence of drugs and alcohol, you have rights. To discuss your situation, call us at 732-257-1137 or contact us online today. We serve clients in Ocean County, Monmouth County, Mercer County, Middlesex County, Union County and Somerset County, including Union, Dover, Brick, Jackson, Wall, Woodbridge, East Brunswick, Evesham, Howell, Robbinsville, Bound Brook, Neptune, Hamilton, Linden City, Bridgewater and Tinton Falls.

 

Filed Under: Criminal Law, Driving Under the Influence of Drugs, DWI - DUI, Mixing Prescription Drugs and Alcohol, New Jersey Attorney Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

New Jersey DWI – DUI Lawyer Edward Janzekovich – DUI – DWI Checkpoints

February 23, 2016 by

In general, police officers in New Jersey can only stop a vehicle if they have a reasonable suspicion that an offense has been committed. They must also be able to specifically describe the grounds for their suspicion. Despite this constitutional protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, police may randomly stop drivers at sobriety checkpoints (also called roadblocks) even if they have no reason to believe that anyone in the vehicle committed an offense. Because random checkpoint stops are such an intrusive law enforcement technique, the police must be able to show a rational basis for establishing the roadblock. There are strict requirements for both setting up and executing roadblocks.

What To Expect At A Sobriety Checkpoint

As you approach a road block, you should see signs and lighting designating the checkpoint area. You will be required to slow down and wait for your turn to be processed through the checkpoint. Police officers will detain drivers in a pre-selected pattern (for example, every driver or every fifth driver). Drivers cannot be stopped on their appearance alone.

If you are stopped, you will be detained for a brief period of time. Police may ask basic questions, request documentation and look for signs that you are under the influence of drugs or alcohol. If you exhibit these signs, you will be asked to move your car to a separate area where you will be asked to undergo a field sobriety test.

Roadblock Requirements

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. This means that if police do not follow the proper procedures for setting up and executing a roadblock, any evidence obtained may be inadmissible in court—including breathalyzer or blood test results. Courts will consider various factors in determining whether a roadblock was proper, including:

  • Whether notice of the time, date and location of the roadblock was published in advance
  • Whether advance warning was given to individual approaching motorists (use of lights, signs, etc.)
  • Whether statistical data demonstrates that the roadblock was set up in a particularly problematic location for drinking and driving
  • Whether public safety and awareness are fostered by the checkpoint
  • The time of day when the roadblock is conducted
  • Average length each motorist is detained
  • Whether less intrusive measures could have been used to combat drunk driving in the area

Police officers and state troopers do not have the authority to select a DUI checkpoint location or time. They must first receive a directive from their commanding officer.

What Happens if I Attempt to Evade a Roadblock?

If you are intoxicated and attempt to evade a properly established road block, this may give police sufficient reasonable suspicion to stop your vehicle.

New Jersey DUI Lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich Represents Drivers Who Have Been Charged With DWI at Police Roadblocks

State and federal laws carefully protect the rights of citizens to be free from unlawful searches and seizures. If you were stopped at a sobriety checkpoint and arrested for driving under the influence, New Jersey DWI lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich will obtain all documents relating to the establishment of the road block, and analyze it to determine whether it was legal. I will also look at the circumstances surrounding your stop to determine whether police followed proper procedures and detained you for a reasonable amount of time. Unreasonable detentions raise different constitutional issues and may provide you with additional defenses.

We proudly serve clients in Ocean County, Monmouth County, Mercer County, Middlesex County, Union County and Somerset County. To discuss your case, call us at 732-257-1137 or contact us online today.

Filed Under: Drunk Driving, DWI - DUI, DWI & DUI Checkpoints, Field Sobriety Tests, Illegal Searches and Seizures, New Jersey Attorney, New Jersey Search Without Warrant Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Disclaimer : The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

Law Office of Edward M. Janzekovich
540 Old Bridge Turnpike
South River, NJ 08882
Phone: 732-257-1137 Fax: 732-791-1437
E-mail: [email protected]

Copyright © 2015 Law Office of Edward M. Janzekovich.
All Rights Reserved.