DWI & DUI Checkpoints

New Jersey DWI Attorney Reminds You to Be Extra Careful About Drunk Driving Around the Holidays

December 13, 2016 by EMJanzekovich

With Thanksgiving just behind us, and holidays like Christmas, Hanukkah, and New Year’s Eve around the corner, we at the Law Office of Edward M. Janzekovich would like to remind you to be extra careful about drunk driving when it comes to going out and celebrating this festive and happy holiday season.

Not only should you be extra careful so that you can keep yourself and your loved ones safe, you should also be aware that police officers and government officials are on high alert for any potential drunk or intoxicated drivers during the holidays. One little mistake, such as thinking you can drive when your blood alcohol content (BAC) is actually above .08%, can result in serious consequences – such as fines, jail time, or loss of driving privileges – that affect you for years to come.

Heightened Police Activity and DUI Checkpoints

Last year, Pennsauken, Woodbridge, Spotswood, and Wall townships reported the most DWI arrests in the state between December 11, 2015 and January 1, 2016. This past Thanksgiving, NJ.com reported that at least 15 New Jersey towns planned to increase DUI patrols and checkpoints during the holiday weekend (http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2016/11/where_nj_cops_are_increasing_dui_patrols_checkpoin.html). These included:

Atlantic Highlands
Aberdeen
Belmar
Hazlet
Highlands
Holmdel
Keyport
Keansburg
Matawan
Middletown
Neptune
New Brunswick
North Bergen
Union Beach
Union City

Between now and New Year’s Day, police officers across the state will be on the look-out for any signs or drunk driving. Therefore, if you plan to go out and drink this holiday season, you should take a taxi, call an Uber, or pick a designated driver. Otherwise, even if you don’t get in an accident and hurt yourself or others, you run the risk of getting arrested for drunk driving every time you choose to have even one drink and get behind the wheel.

DUI Checkpoints, Sobriety Tests, and Taking a Breathalyzer

Police officers will be most likely to set up DUI checkpoints at the location of bars or other venues where lots of people will be drinking. This is important, because it means you could be randomly stopped and checked for signs of drunk driving, even if you do not display any erratic behavior on the road – such as swerving, speeding, or braking unexpectedly – just for going to certain venues during the holidays. In New Jersey, police officers are actually prohibited from stopping cars based on appearance alone at checkpoints, so cars will be detained in a pre-selected pattern such as every car or every third car.

That means that even if you are driving perfectly, you could be pulled over at a DUI checkpoint. Then, if the police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe you were driving drunk – such as smelling alcohol on your breath – you could be asked to take a field sobriety test or possibly even take a breathalyzer.

Once you’ve taken a breathalyzer, any BAC reading of .08% or higher can potentially be used as proof of guilt for a charge of DUI/DWI. That means that even if you were driving perfectly, and you do not believe you did anything wrong, you could still be convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol based on your breathalyzer results. As we’ve discussed in this blog before, whether you are functional or coordinated during a sobriety test is not a defense against a BAC at or above 0.08%

Therefore, the best advice we can give you this holiday season is to be careful. If you or someone you know is arrested or charged with a DUI or DWI, it is important to contact an experienced attorney immediately. A professional drunk driving lawyer will review your case and can help fight the charges against you.

New Jersey Drunk Driving Attorney Edward M. Janzekovich Is There for You This Holiday Season

If you or someone you know is charged for any crime relating to driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, it is extremely important to contact an experienced DUI/DWI attorney who will explain what consequences you are facing in your specific situation. If you go to court, an experienced lawyer will also argue on your behalf and may be able to have the charges dropped entirely. Having an experienced drunk driving lawyer can make all the difference. To speak with an experienced New Jersey DWI/DUI lawyer about your situation, call us at 732-257-1137 or contact us online today. We serve clients throughout the state of New Jersey.

Filed Under: Drunk Driving, DWI - DUI, DWI & DUI Checkpoints Tagged With: alcohol blood testing new jersey, checkpoints new jersey, DUI – DWI Defense Attorney, dui checkpoints new jersey, dui dwi, dwi, dwi dui lawyer, new jersey dwi checkpoint, new jersey roadblock sobriety checkpoints, nj roadblock dwi checkpoints

Drunk Driving Charges and Your Right to Receive Instructions in a Language You Can Understand

December 6, 2016 by EMJanzekovich

dwi-img

In all states, including New Jersey, if you arrested for driving while intoxicated, the police officer must read a “standard statement” that contains instructions telling the driver that he or she MUST submit to breath testing if there is probable cause to believe that the person was driving under the influence of alcohol. Part of the standard statement – sometimes referred to in New Jersey as Paragraph 36 – is the warning that if you refuse to submit to the breath test and “if a court finds you guilty of the refusal, you will be subject to various penalties, including license revocation of up to 20 years, a fine of up to $2000, installation of an ignition interlock, and referral to an Intoxicated Driver Resource Center. These penalties may be in addition to penalties imposed by the court for any other offense of which you are found guilty.” The entire statement is meant to inform you that there are serious consequences that will occur if you refuse to provide a breath sample. A copy of Paragraph 36, as updated in 2012, can be found at http://njpdresources.com/dui/pdfs/english1.pdf

But what happens if you or someone you know does not speak English? ¿Hablas Español? Nói tiếng Việt? Говорить по-русски? Another language? Regardless of what language you speak, New Jersey law also provides that you have a right to have these instructions provided to you in a language that you can understand. Otherwise, it is possible that your rights are being impermissibly violated.

State v. Rodriguez-Alejo

In State v. Rodriguez-Alejo, a Spanish-speaking man who could barely speak English, and who had only been in the United States for two years and had taken his driving test in Spanish, was pulled over and suspected of drunk driving. At the police station, the officer attempted to read the standard instructions to the defendant, and the man stated that he did not understand. Although he tried to follow along with the police officer anyway, who used a combination of words and gestures to provide instructions, the defendant was not able to provide a proper breath sample and was later convicted for refusing to comply with the breath sample requirements.

On appeal, the New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division restated that a police officer must read the standard statement to any defendant who is arrested for DWI/DUI, and the defendant must CLEARLY agree to submit to a breathalyzer test. Therefore, the Court held that reading the standard statement to motorists in a language they do not speak is the same thing as not reading the statement at all.

In order to be “informed” of the warnings that are provided in Paragraph 36, the information must be given to the defendant in a language he or she speaks and understands. The same reasoning applies to any instructions that are given to a defendant about how to actually take a breathalyzer test. Based on this holding, the Court decided that the Spanish-speaking defendant could not be convicted for refusing to provide a breath sample.

State v. Shaymardanov

It is important to note, however, that a defendant only needs to understand the instructions being given to him – the instructions do not need to be given in the defendant’s best or native language.

Recently, in the case of State v. Shaymardanov, the Appellate Division revisited State v. Rodriguez-Alejo with regard to a Russian-speaking defendant who was pulled over and charged with driving under the influence of alcohol. Although the Court determined that Rodriguez-Alejo was still good law, the Appellate Division upheld the conviction, finding that the driver always appeared to understand the police officer and the police officer had no trouble understanding the defendant.

Instructions Available in Other Languages

Since at least 2010, the State has arranged for certified translated versions of the standard statement to be prepared—in both written and audio form—in the nine foreign languages in which the MVC offers the written driver’s test – Arabic, Chinese (Mandarin), French, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, and Spanish. If you or someone you care about is arrested on suspicion of drunk driving, it is likely that the police will be able to provide you with instructions in a language you can understand. While you should always contact an experienced New Jersey DWI / DUI lawyer / attorney if you are charged, an attorney may be able to help if you were never provided with instructions in a language you could understand.

New Jersey DUI/DWI Attorney Edward M. Janzekovich Will Fight to Make Sure Your Rights Were Protected

If you or someone you know is charged for any crime relating to driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, it is extremely important to contact an experienced DUI/DWI attorney who can explain what rights you have in your specific situation. If you go to court, an experienced lawyer can also make sure you get the best result possible. Having an experienced drunk driving lawyer can make all the difference. To speak with an experienced New Jersey DWI/DUI lawyer about your situation, call us at 732-257-1137 or contact us online today. We serve clients throughout the state of New Jersey.

Filed Under: Drunk Driving, DWI - DUI, DWI & DUI Checkpoints, Nre Jersey Drunk Driving Penalties Tagged With: alcohol blood testing new jersey, drinking and driving, drinking driving new jersey, dui dwi

Your Right to an Independent Blood Alcohol Test

December 1, 2016 by EMJanzekovich

Drunk-Driving-Attorney

In New Jersey, if you are pulled over and the officer suspects you were driving drunk, he or she may use a breathalyzer test to measure your blood alcohol content (BAC), which can be used as evidence against you if you are later charged for DUI/DWI. Police stations across the state use a machine called the Alcotest 7110 MK-IIIC to measure your BAC and determine whether or not you are at or over the legal limit of .08%.

Importantly, many drivers do not know that if you submit to a breathalyzer test, you also have the right to an independent test of your urine, blood, or breath sample. If your BAC results are close to .08%, an independent test can show that the breathalyzer results were inaccurate and you were actually below the legal limit for drunk driving. Similarly, the law requires that you be informed of your right to an independent chemical test, and, if you can prove that the government failed to inform you of this right, you may be able to have the breathalyzer evidence thrown out.

As always, challenging the evidence against you in a DUI/DWI trial can be very complicated, and it is important to retain an experienced drunk driving lawyer if you or a loved one is charged with driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, in order to ensure that the best defense is presented on your behalf.

Your Legal Right to an Independent Breath, Blood, or Urine Test

N.J.S.A. 39:4–50.2 establishes that drunk driving is a quasi-crime, and a driver who is suspected of drunk driving does not have a right to refuse to provide a breath sample (as discussed previously in this blog). At the same time, if a police officer decides a driver must provide a breath sample for the purposes of determining BAC, N.J.S.A. 39:4–50.2 also provides the same driver with the right to have a person or physician of the driver’s own choosing perform an independent breath, urine, and blood test. This protects the driver’s rights and helps to ensure that any BAC test performed by the police is accurate.

Learning About Your Right to an Independent Test

New Jersey law actually states that a defendant must be informed of his or her right to an independent test by the police officer who orders the breath test. Of course, this is limited to situations in which the individual is required to provide a breath sample, and there is no equivalent requirement in the event that BAC is calculated based on a blood sample.

In practice, police officers in most police stations will read a series of pre-printed paragraphs to any driver who is being asked to provide a breath sample. These paragraphs generally include a statement – referred to in many places as “paragraph 36” – that attempts to inform the driver of his or her right to obtain an independent test. The courts have considered this to be sufficient notice under the law.

If no notice is provided to a driver when he or she is asked to provide a breath sample, then an experienced attorney may be able to keep out any BAC evidence obtained by the police officers at the time of trial.

Having an Independent BAC Test Performed

The law does not require a police officer or a police station to have any established procedures to help a driver obtain an independent chemical test – however, the law is clear that police may not interfere with or thwart a suspect drunk driver’s attempt to exercise the right to independent examination.

Therefore, a driver is largely on his or her own with regard to obtain an independent chemical test. He or she may do this by contacting an attorney or family member who can help get an independent test done. In State v. Jalkiewicz, the court ruled that the police fulfilled its duty when it advised the defendant of his right to an independent test and then summoned a taxi cab for the driver.

At the same time, in State v. Bradley and State v. Nicastro, the court ruled that the government actively prevented suspected drunk drivers from exercising their rights to an independent BAC test when the police refused the drivers’ request to be taken to the hospital for an independent test and also refused the drivers’ request to call a taxi to take them to the hospital. In both of these cases, the court determined that the BAC test results taken by the police could not be used in court.

Finally, in State v. Greeley, the Supreme Court determined that if the police refuse a suspected drunk driver’s request for a taxi, there must be some means for the person to obtain an independent chemical test, such as being released into the custody of a family member or friend.

As in Bradley and Nicastro, it is extremely important that you contact an experienced attorney whenever you are charged or suspected of a DUI or DWI. An attorney can help provide the best defense in your case and ensure that your rights have not be violated.

New Jersey DUI/DWI Attorney Edward M. Janzekovich Will Fight for Your Rights

If you or someone you know is charged or suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, it is extremely important to contact an experienced DUI/DWI attorney who can explain what rights you have in your specific situation. If you go to court, an experienced lawyer can also make sure you get the best result possible and can make all the difference. To speak with an experienced New Jersey DWI/DUI lawyer bout your situation, call us at 732-257-1137 contact us online today. We serve clients throughout the state of New Jersey.

Filed Under: Drunk Driving, DWI - DUI, DWI & DUI Checkpoints, New Jersey Attorney Tagged With: alcohol blood testing new jersey, drinking and driving, drinking driving new jersey, dui dwi

Your Right to Discovery When Charged with a DUI / DWI

September 7, 2016 by EMJanzekovich

In New Jersey, the law states that if you are charged with driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol, you are entitled to discovery in your case. That means that you are allowed to request all the evidence held by the prosecution that is relevant to your situation. In State v. Utsch, the New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division ruled that a defendant is entitled to discovery in any case where he or she may be imprisoned or subject to serious consequences – and a DUI / DWI conviction is subject to severe penalties in the form of possible imprisonment, extensive fines, and almost assuredly will result in some period of license suspension.

How Do You Obtain Discovery?

Obtaining discovery is a relatively simple procedure, because the law provides for discovery in any DUI/DWI case. In order to receive the relevant evidence, all you need to do is make a proper written demand upon the prosecutor, and an experienced DUI attorney will know how to request discovery, who to request discovery from, and what discovery to request. Importantly, the law requires that the demand for discovery be made at the same time that the DWI attorney enters his or her appearance with the Court.

What Evidence Are You Allowed to Obtain in Discovery?

The Court Rules limit the scope of discovery in a drunk driving case to relevant materials, which means the evidence must reasonably be usable to assist in the defendant’s case. Relevant evidence includes:

Records of statements, confessions, or admissions made by the defendant;
Recorded grand jury proceedings;
Results or reports of any physical or mental examinations and of scientific tests or experiments made in connection with the matter;
Records of the defendant’s prior convictions;
Photographs or images related to the case;
Video or sound recordings related to the case;
Names, addresses, and statements of any witnesses or other persons who know relevant evidence or information;
Any police reports;

Furthermore, in the case of State v. Chun, the New Jersey Supreme Court outlined the discovery permitted in a DUI case involving an Alcotest or breathalyzer test, which includes:

New Standard Solution report of the most recent control test solution change, and the credentials of the operator who performed that change;
Certificate of Analysis for the .10 percent solution used in the Report;
Draeger Safety Certificate of Accuracy for the Alcotest CU34 Simulator;
Draeger Safety Certificate of Accuracy for the Alcotest 7110 Temperature Probe;
Draeger Safety Certificate of Accuracy for the Alcotest 7110 Instrument;
Calibration Records;
Certificate of Analysis for the .04, .08, .10, and .16 percent solutions used in Calibration;
Draeger Safety Ertco-Hart Calibration Reports; and
Additional standard items of Alcotest discovery including the alcohol influence report and worksheet.

When Are You Entitled to Discovery?

The New Jersey Court Rules require a prosecutor to respond to a Discovery Request within 10 days of receiving the request, although this does not mean the prosecutor must deliver all the evidence in that time. Usually, the prosecutor will respond by informing the defense attorney that a request for the evidence has been made to the proper police records clerk for processing and transmission. The prosecutor is then responsible for providing complete discovery or for providing the defendant with a list of the evidence that is missing with an explanation of why it has not been handed over.

If discovery is not provided by the prosecutor, and an attempt is made to reach an agreement on discovery issues, a defendant may make a formal motion with the Court for relief, which can include a Court order that would prohibit the prosecution from using the undisclosed evidence later on. A defendant may also be able to make a motion to limit the time in which evidence must be handed over, and if it is not provided within the time limit, the case may be dismissed or thrown out. For this reason, it is especially important to always consult an experienced DWI / DUI lawyer if you are pulled over and charged with drunk driving. An experienced DUI attorney will know the best way to defend against the charges or have the charges dismissed completely.

New Jersey Drunk Driving Attorney Edward M. Janzekovich Knows What to Do If You Are Charged with DUI / DWI

A DUI/DWI charge for operating a motor vehicle will involve many complicated evidential issues. Such a charge can also result in severe penalties that affect you and your loved ones. If you are charged with drunk driving or driving under the influence of any substance in New Jersey, an experienced DWI/DUI attorney can make all the difference. To speak with an experienced New Jersey DWI lawyer about your situation, call us at 732-257-1137 or a href=”/contact/”>contact us online today. We serve clients throughout the state of New Jersey.

Filed Under: Drunk Driving, DWI - DUI, DWI & DUI Checkpoints, Field Sobriety Tests

Reasonable Suspicion is Required to Administer a Field Sobriety Test

August 3, 2016 by EMJanzekovich

If you are pulled over by a police officer in New Jersey, and the officer thinks that you have been driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, one of the things he or she may ask that you do is perform a series of movements that make up a field sobriety test – including walking in a straight line, following a pen with your eyes, holding out your arms and touching your nose with one finger, or counting while standing on one foot. This may come before or in addition to a breathalyzer test if the officer believes you are intoxicated. If you are later charged with a DUI / DWI, your ability to perform the field sobriety test may be used as evidence in a case against you. There is no statutory penalty for refusing to perform a field sobriety test in New Jersey, but if you do refuse, a judge may consider your refusal to mean you were too drunk to do them.

Nonetheless, a police officer does not have an unlimited power to ask anyone and everyone to perform a field sobriety test. Numerous New Jersey court cases have said that a police officer may only ask you to perform a field sobriety test if he or she has a “reasonable, articulable suspicion” that you are driving drunk or under the influence of some other substance. If the State cannot prove by a preponderance of evidence that the officer had this “reasonable and articulable suspicion” at the time the field sobriety test was performed, then your attorney may make a Motion to Suppress before the court to have the evidence excluded. This means that the prosecutor will not be allowed to use this evidence against you to prove the charges of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and can ultimately prevent the State from proving its case.

There is no specific definition of a “reasonable and articulable suspicion” under the law, but the standard is based on the police officer’s knowledge, experience, observations, and reasonable inferences. For example, a reasonable suspicion includes if the officer smells alcohol coming from the car or the driver’s breath, if the driver had bloodshot or watery eyes, or if the driver’s speech was slurred.

In the recent case of State v. Dunn, the New Jersey Appellate Division found that a driver’s statements regarding drinks she had had earlier in the day could create a reasonable, articulable suspicion that the driver was operating the vehicle while intoxicated, even if there were no other signs of DUI / DWI – no detectable odor of alcohol, slurred speech, or bloodshot eyes. In Dunn, the police officer did not ask the driver if she had been drinking, but she volunteered that she had had three beers earlier in the day. This was enough for the officer to ask the defendant to step out of the car, at which time he smelled the odor of alcohol.

It is important to note that a police officer must first have a legitimate reason to make a motor vehicle stop before pulling a driver over. Furthermore, if the reason the driver was pulled over was for a minor violation, like a traffic offense, the officer must have a reasonable, articulable suspicion that is unrelated to the traffic offense before the officer can administer a field sobriety test to see if the driver was operating the vehicle under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

We know from Dunn, that if the driver admits to drinking at least three beers earlier in the day, reasonable, articulable suspicion is created for an officer to administer field sobriety testing.

But what if you admitted to having only one drink or two, would that rise to the same level? As a result of the Dunn decision, I would say yes, that any admission to drinking any amount of alcohol prior to operating a motor vehicle would probably create reasonable, articulable suspicion that the operator may be intoxicated and allow the officer to conduct field sobriety tests.

In New Jersey, the ambiguous nature of the law means that it is important to obtain an experienced drunk driving attorney in any situation where you or someone you know is charged with DUI / DWI. The facts of every case are different and can influence how the case is tried. An experienced DUI attorney will be best suited to present the best defense possible or have the charges against you dropped completely.

New Jersey Drunk Driving Attorney Edward M. Janzekovich Can Help Review the Evidence Against You in a DUI / DWI Case

A DUI / DWI charge for operating a motor vehicle will involve many complicated evidential issues. Such a charge can also result in severe penalties that affect you and your loved ones. If you are charged with drunk driving or driving under the influence of any substance in New Jersey, an experienced DWI / DUI attorney can make all the difference. To speak with an experienced New Jersey DWI lawyer about your situation, call us at 732-257-1137 or contact us online today. We serve clients throughout the State of New Jersey.

Filed Under: Drunk Driving, DWI - DUI, DWI & DUI Checkpoints

New Jersey DWI – DUI Lawyer Edward Janzekovich – DUI – DWI Checkpoints

February 23, 2016 by EMJanzekovich

In general, police officers in New Jersey can only stop a vehicle if they have a reasonable suspicion that an offense has been committed. They must also be able to specifically describe the grounds for their suspicion. Despite this constitutional protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, police may randomly stop drivers at sobriety checkpoints (also called roadblocks) even if they have no reason to believe that anyone in the vehicle committed an offense. Because random checkpoint stops are such an intrusive law enforcement technique, the police must be able to show a rational basis for establishing the roadblock. There are strict requirements for both setting up and executing roadblocks.

What To Expect At A Sobriety Checkpoint

As you approach a road block, you should see signs and lighting designating the checkpoint area. You will be required to slow down and wait for your turn to be processed through the checkpoint. Police officers will detain drivers in a pre-selected pattern (for example, every driver or every fifth driver). Drivers cannot be stopped on their appearance alone.

If you are stopped, you will be detained for a brief period of time. Police may ask basic questions, request documentation and look for signs that you are under the influence of drugs or alcohol. If you exhibit these signs, you will be asked to move your car to a separate area where you will be asked to undergo a field sobriety test.

Roadblock Requirements

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. This means that if police do not follow the proper procedures for setting up and executing a roadblock, any evidence obtained may be inadmissible in court—including breathalyzer or blood test results. Courts will consider various factors in determining whether a roadblock was proper, including:

Whether notice of the time, date and location of the roadblock was published in advance
Whether advance warning was given to individual approaching motorists (use of lights, signs, etc.)
Whether statistical data demonstrates that the roadblock was set up in a particularly problematic location for drinking and driving
Whether public safety and awareness are fostered by the checkpoint
The time of day when the roadblock is conducted
Average length each motorist is detained
Whether less intrusive measures could have been used to combat drunk driving in the area

Police officers and state troopers do not have the authority to select a DUI checkpoint location or time. They must first receive a directive from their commanding officer.

What Happens if I Attempt to Evade a Roadblock?

If you are intoxicated and attempt to evade a properly established road block, this may give police sufficient reasonable suspicion to stop your vehicle.

New Jersey DUI Lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich Represents Drivers Who Have Been Charged With DWI at Police Roadblocks

State and federal laws carefully protect the rights of citizens to be free from unlawful searches and seizures. If you were stopped at a sobriety checkpoint and arrested for driving under the influence, New Jersey DWI lawyer Edward M. Janzekovich will obtain all documents relating to the establishment of the road block, and analyze it to determine whether it was legal. I will also look at the circumstances surrounding your stop to determine whether police followed proper procedures and detained you for a reasonable amount of time. Unreasonable detentions raise different constitutional issues and may provide you with additional defenses.

We proudly serve clients in Ocean County, Monmouth County, Mercer County, Middlesex County, Union County and Somerset County. To discuss your case, call us at 732-257-1137 or contact us online today.

Filed Under: Drunk Driving, DWI - DUI, DWI & DUI Checkpoints, Field Sobriety Tests, Illegal Searches and Seizures, New Jersey Attorney, New Jersey Search Without Warrant Tagged With: blood alcohol test new jersey, checkpoints new jersey, DUI – DWI Defense Attorney, dui attorney, dui checkpoints new jersey, dwi attorney, dwi checkpoints new jersey, East Brunswick DWI Attorney, new jersey blood alcohol testing, new jersey dui attorney, new jersey dui refusal, new jersey dui roadblock, new jersey dwi checkpoint, new jersey roadblock sobriety checkpoints, nj roadblock dwi checkpoints, Union Township DUI DWI, Union Township NJ DWI Attorney, unreasonable searches and seizures, unreasonable searches and seizures dui, unreasonable searches and seizures dwi, unreasonable searches and seizures new jersey

Contact Us Today